Peer Review Process

SJPHM journals make use of a double-blind peer assessment process. When content material is regular for peer assessment, the name, details, and affiliations of the writer aren't discovered to the reviewers; likewise, the identities of the reviewers aren't discovered to the authors. Reviewers compare the accuracy, originality, and crowning glory of every manuscript submitted, and offer sincere remarks to different Editorial Board members.

Points to Note

Reviewers need to be capable of examine everything of a paper. Reviewers do now no longer edit manuscript content material, however offer remarks and recommendations for improvement.

Reviewers are required to keep anonymity and confidentiality at some stage in the peer evaluate process; reviewers might not touch the writer with out permission from the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.

Any questions concerning the ethics or behavior of an creator or reviewer need to be directed to the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.

Any questions on the moral behavior of authors or reviewers need to be directed to the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.

The choices of the Reviewer need to by no means be motivated with the aid of using outside factors, which include the origin, nationality, race, gender, ethnicity, religion, or political affairs of the writer. The validity and the high-satisfactory of the content material supplied are the handiest grounds for evaluation.